Some pictures just don’t make sense. Like this one…
Submitted by: dunno source via Submit Page
“Look, Ma! I married a decorative boulder!” Hey guy, way to stay classy.
It’s better than marrying a she-man…
Submitted by: dunno source via Submit Page
I don’t know what’s happening here, but I suddenly feel very alone and scared. Please tell me this is some Mo’Nique shit. Otherwise, I guess I’ll just chalk it up to magic. And extreme shoe confusion.
-
-
Copy & paste this:
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
on the second pic she is just sitting on her knees sitting on the groom.
Yeah, if you look at the folds and shadows in her dress, you can see her legs going off to either side.
More dumbassery. Can’t we find pictures that are funny and not photoshopped?
Er- nothing is shopped here. The wife with man legs sitting on her hubby and the other chick just has her head in a rock….
There’s folklore about stones with naturally occurring holes through them having healing properties. Children were passed through the hole in the stone to restore or ensure their health.
But she’s not gonna fit through there, and she shouldn’t have turned her back on him even if she did marry him. =P
I’m not gonna shave my legs when I’m gonna get married either. So…
Surely those legs are photoshopped. Please tell me they’re photoshopped. T_T
@gg
They’re not photoshopped. Can’t you find comments that aren’t idiotic?
Um, maybe I’m seeing things … but does anyone else notice that the ‘lady’ in the second picture appears to have an Adam’s apple?
Actually it’s a common misconception that women don’t have an Adam’s apple, everyone has one, they’re just generally so small on women that it’s not usually noticeable.
She’s a she (probably). This is a new trend in wedding photography that I’ve seen way too many times in the last few months – you have the groom sit with his pants pulled up, then have the bride sit on his lap and cover him with the bottom of her gown, so it looks like his legs are hers.
another example: http://theadventureofalifetime.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/photographer-toronto-gta-weddings.jpg?w=450
@Jami, you’re a moron. Open your eyes and look at the photo if you can pull your head out of your butt long enough
No, GG, you are the moron. This was proven not photoshopped. It’s a STUPID photography trend in weddings.
I’m sick and tired of inbred trolls like you calling “photoshop” in some sort of pathetic attempt to look smart. It just makes you look stupid. Like when a trampy teenager on a talk show holds up her hand and says “WHATEVER! WHATEVER!”
Here’s something to remember – having children with your siblings is a BAD idea. If you ever need a reminder, look in the mirror.
@AmberMoony
That would explain why the dress is so puffed up on the sides and the bit of grey that the bottom of her veil.
It is NOT photoshopped! I have seen this done MANY times before (my family is lame).
You can see the groom – under her veil is a bit of his butt. Also notice there is no back to the “bench” she’s on? Look underneath of it, it is not a narrow seated bench, it is at least 3 ft deep.
I resemble that she-man remark, I’ll have you know! (No, really, I do.) You’re just jealous that we have the best of both worlds and you don’t.
Transphobia?
Way to stay classy.
First thing I noticed was the other happy couple in the background, all blurry-like.
There’s a difference between a “shop” and an image manipulated pre-shot. But this one is just stupid, really.
In the first photo, the bride is taking a drink from a water fountain (environmentally disguised for a public park). Note the shorter “boulder” next to it. The groom is just being a classless arse.
He’s not being an “arse”…he’s taking an amusing photo on their wedding day. I’ve seen way less “classy” things done at weddings. Including first pulling a thong out from under the dress instead of the garter. That’s real nice.
Her top half married his bottom half.
I took the first one as meaning that the bride was between a rock and a hard place. It is tacky nonetheless.