
Submitted by: dunno source via Submit Page
Over the past several months, I’ve come to understand something: People really like being under a bride’s full skirt. A LOT. Is it a hide and go seek thing? Are folks checking in on Foursquare under there? “Susan is the Mayor of underneath Jessica’s skirt.” I just don’t get it.
-
-
Copy & paste this:



I find all of this deeply erotic, fortunately I also know what women wear under their wedding dress because of this thread – http://www.iamstaggered.com/forum/style/under-the-dress
Well that is where all the action is going to be, later in the night.
All I can think is that woman yelling, “Echo.. echo.. echo…”
Please god, someone make comment on the source of the title for this picture before my head explodes.
Too late.
(Such a good movie…)
Oh yes, not the only one who knows its greatness!
Excellent.
The only reason I checked the comments! ‘Had to make sure props were given to dear DDF
“OMG, this chick’s really a guy!”
no one has commented on those witchy shoes? My toes hurt just looking at them!
Since we can’t see the heels, it kind of looks like she standing on her pointy tip-toes!
totally shopped
i see fake boobies
OH! I think I have spotted her ‘something blue’! Has she seen a doctor about that?
OMG DROP DEAD FRED!!. is she gona call her a mega b*tch and then tell her to p*ss off lol. I love that movie!!! I want some pants pie now
ROFL … then she follows the bride and groom back to their room and watches as they peck at and stomp on each others heads.
Why didn’t the bride shave her legs? It seems like an important day to do it…
@ sweet d:
The bride’s legs are shaved, maybe you’re seeing uneven skin tone. Either way, why the fuck should she have to? Did the groom shave his legs?
[...] don’t understand the appeal of these shots. I never have, and I never will. Who wants to pretend to give birth on their wedding day when [...]
[...] the space underneath the bride’s dress also known as the Forbidden City? ZING! Seriously, though, is this an ancient tradition [...]
Bad taste is evident, again!