
Submitted by: Viv via Submit Page
This is exciting because I’ve seen this couple before, as part of their body paint photo shoot. At the time I was all, “Um, who the hell would do this? Who wants their boobs to look like whipped cream mounds on their wedding day? And don’t even get me started on those swirly thighs!”
Later, I felt kind of bad about that. But now that I see the expressions on these passersby faces, I see that I was right all along. There is nothing good about swirly thighs, and the groom’s tights are still very, very wrong. Case closed!
-
-
Copy & paste this:



That’s not her groom. The bride is marrying a Clydesdale.
Can you imagine wedding night, when the groom peels off his skivvies and is left with a big flesh colored patch? Ha, that’d suck! And you thought severe tan lines looked bad.
It would help if the bride had lost another 15 pounds and reduced that belly and those HUGE thighs.
There is something really wrong with you. Keep your toothpick fetish to yourself.
No toothpick fetish here. The whole look is ugly and does not flatter the bride.
Shes not fat…little curvy, and some people have stomachs…this look wouldn’t flatter anybody. Her thighs look good to me. Ray ray, she didn’t do it for you, who the hell do you think you are?
Chances are, people slamming her have all sorts of body “flaws”.
the lady is classical. not some silicone-boobed, anorexic, fake-tanned modern freak. she is the very image of fertility and health, the archetypal female figure. sheesh, some people.
looks to me like another archetype of some out of shape dependent marying a in shape military dude. Yeah, I bet she is fertile, I bet she’ll be perpetually pregnant, long most dependents. BTW, I don’t think she looks bad and I agree that being skinny isn’t healthy either, but I don’t think that love-handles are a medical indicator of fertility or health, but rather the opposite, and definately doesn’t indicate an “archetypal female figure”.
Being larger is an indication of being able to feed ones self. In old days, the larger, the better, as it meant you were rich and didn’t have to do anything. Way farther back, it would have meant-if it happened- that you’re a damned good hunter, either by setting traps or getting enough to actually gain weight. Also, it’s true. Toothpicks wouldn’t be able to give birth to kids as easily, or even get pregnant. Without a healthy weight, eggs aren’t produced..etc.
You must be crazy. Her body is fine.
I have to disagree with ray ray. She’s fine the way she is. I just think that she should not have swirls anywhere on her. Outside of that, she could have went with my favorite: latex.
Her thighs aren’t that “HUGE”… but the tulle attached to her legs makes me think of bell bottom pants
That groom looks pretty hot. I might be willing to wear ridiculous body paint just to have a honeymoon with him. I used to wish that tights were a more popular fashion for men, but I’ve changed my mind. Now I hope for painted-on pants.
I actually think the groom looks very good (though they could have done more to make sure his shorts matched the color of the paint), but I really don’t like the “knee poofs” on the bride’s outfit.
I get the idea behind it (assuming it’s supposed to look like a pencil skirt with a lacy flare at the bottom) but it just didn’t turn out well.
Wow, the new Doctor and his traveling companion. They’re headed for the T.A.R.D.I.S. in the far right of the picture. Disguised as a red call box.
they are not seriouse enough to make babies. if they do the kids will. die.
“Who wants their boobs to look like whipped cream mounds on their wedding day?”
Who in their right mind would want anything else?
In other news, gay holding on line two for you.
Yep, because the veil maintains her modesty.
A real Marine would kick this guy’s ass eight ways from Sunday, just for being an idiot. Body paint is great for Halloween, but your wedding day? Come on.
It wasn’t a real wedding. It was a photo shoot.
it’s wasn’t a photoshoot either. it was for a british reality game show.
As a former Marine I just wanna point out that the rank painted on the arms is upside down. Obviously the guy in the pic isnt a real Marine.
look at the link. *british*
he’s not wearing tights. it’s pretty much all paint. it was for some reality tv show that was on a while back
The groom has a better body than her.
Becki beat me to it- this is from a photo shoot for GMTV in the UK a couple of years ago:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/pictures-of-the-year/3795017/Pictures-of-the-year-bizarre.html?image=9
So they are real couples but not real outfits… Hope the prize was good…
I gotta say, they’re both hot! I’ve always believed a woman should have curves, not angles. And he’s got an awesome upper body (legs a bit thin though…). Very clever photo shoot, but they could have gone all the way (minus the skimpy little shorts).
[...] More Questionable “Dresses” Incorrect source or offensive?Tags:beach wedding, long torso, mermaid, sequins, sparkle explosion, [...]
rayray: She is not fat and she has normal female thighs. You are a pedophile if you think otherwise.
I definitely disagree with rayray but jonathan: what you say makes no sense. Do you even know what a pedophile is?
I think the pedophile comment is because if her thighs were any thinner she would look underdeveloped, teenagerish, jail-bait. Twig like thighs = very young looking.
Thats a British uniform, and British chevrons point down the arm, towards the enemy, not in the direction of retreat, like those of the US “military”.
Hmmm.
Yeah I don’t think you really want to go there, but you did.
Enemy eh? More like “pee in that direction” as a visual aid.
His chevrons are upside down and are missing the crossed rifles. WTF?
It must be cold out…or is that just the bride is a virgin?
that isnt tights it is paint..
Am I the only one who thinks the groom has a boner?